In the Star Wars universe, the Force is a mystic energy field generated by living beings that binds the galaxy together. The ability to wield the Force gives Jedi Knights their superhuman abilities, making them peacekeepers of the galaxy. But how powerful would the Jedi be if every ‘transaction’ that used the Force had to be processed through a centralised system that exacted myriad fees and was prone to delays?
Unfortunately for us, the second scenario describes much of the traditional financial universe. Too much friction reduces transaction speed and increases costs. But the age of centralised finance may be coming to an end and the age of decentralised finance (DeFi) beginning, as Campbell Harvey explained in his presentation ‘Rethinking the Global Financial System’, at CFA Institute’s Alpha Summit GLOBAL last month. Indeed, the Duke University finance professor, co-author of DeFi and the Future of Finance and Research Affiliates partner and senior advisor, believes DeFi can transform the financial system and unleash a wave of economic energy.
For more than a century, the traditional financial system has operated with essentially the same model in Harvey’s view. It all depends on the same central banks, the same commercial banks, the same exchanges, the same insurance companies, and so on. For all the technological change and related developments, the basic framework has remained static and centralised.
Lately, fintech has caused some disruption and helped reduce transaction costs. But fintech relies on the same centralised financial architecture, which places a limit on how low those costs can go and how much efficiency can be gained.
“With decentralised finance, that limit doesn’t exist,” Harvey said. “That’s why the current fintech wave will be fleeting.”
Binding the financial galaxy together
DeFi uses peer-to-peer networks to conduct transactions without third-party intermediaries. Digital assets, such as cryptocurrencies, take the form of ‘smart contracts’, which are self-executing algorithms based on blockchain technology. ‘Tokenisation’ is an important aspect of DeFi. Virtual and physical assets can be turned into ‘tokens’ that act as stores of value and can be used in financial transactions. They also give the holder a vote in the governance of a protocol or platform.
Why will DeFi transform the financial system? Because it can solve what Harvey sees as five inherent problems of the traditional financial system: inefficiency, limited access, opacity, centralised control and interoperability.
Inefficiency: Reducing inefficiency means eliminating fees and intermediaries. Even basic transactions — using a debit card, for example — often involve significant fees. Buying a stock might seem fairly straightforward, but actually obtaining ownership requires an intermediary and can take considerable time. With DeFi, the execution and settlement of a trade can happen simultaneously.
Limited access: An estimated 1.7 billion people are unbanked and even more are underbanked. The obstacle for many in these cohorts is financial friction. For example, excessive cost of capital — banks limiting access to loans with lower rates and instead providing lines of credit at much higher interest — prevents many small businesses from pursuing projects that could boost economic growth.
Opacity: That DeFi could ease opacity in the financial system may come as a surprise to the sceptics. In August 2021, for example, US senator Elizabeth Warren wrote to the chair of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), warning about the need to regulate the crypto markets and describing DeFi as ‘highly opaque’.
To Harvey, however, Warren has it backward. “What is opaque is the current financial system,” he said. Because DeFi is based on open-source technology, there is more transparency, not less. With a decentralised exchange, for example, users can see the code, the liquidity and all other details. The traditional financial system, by contrast, has numerous blind spots.
“When you go to a bank, you basically don’t know how healthy that bank is,” Harvey said. “And you rely upon our institutions like the FDIC [Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation] to reduce your risk. But our institutions have a dubious track record at best, and I’m not talking about going back to 1930s. We can go back to the global financial crisis, where many people were dealing with banks that went under.”
Centralised control: Concentration is an essential part of the current financial system. Harvey pointed to the “market power” of commercial banks as an example. “That means that savings rates are lower than they should be, borrowing rates are higher than they should be. Maybe people are excluded,” he said. “And in decentralised finance, by definition, it’s different. It’s highly competitive.”
“There’s no distinction between different actors in the [decentralised] space,” he added. “Everybody is equal.”
Interoperability: This is an unavoidable structural problem in traditional finance -various obstacles prevent platforms and systems from connecting. If someone wants to open an account with an online trading platform, they may have to transfer money from a bank account. The process could take days before the new account is ready to trade.
“In decentralised finance, it’s dramatically different,” Harvey said. “You have a wallet, and you go to an exchange, you connect your wallet and you’re ready to go. Indeed, this is a feature of the so-called Web 3.0 experience. So, with Web 3.0, there’s no username or password. You connect your wallet and you’re ready to go. You’re ready to buy. You’re ready to receive funds. You’re operational. And Web 3.0 is not possible without decentralised finance.”
Exploring the Dark Side
So DeFi will defeat oppressive centralisation and inefficiency and save the financial galaxy. Not so fast. DeFi may also create new types of risks as well as variations on old ones. Harvey has identified five in particular: smart-contract risk, oracle risk, custodial risk, environmental risk and regulatory risk.
Smart-contract risk: Because DeFi is open source, smart contracts are more vulnerable to cybercriminals than conventional systems protected by layers of security around a proprietary source. The nature of smart contracts makes them prone to various flaws: logic errors, economic exploits (exploiting mispricing, for example), flash loan attacks and governance risk (for contracts with changing parameters). As more flaws are exposed, security will improve. “But right now, it is very risky,” Harvey concluded.
Oracle risk: Smart contracts depend on outside information, such as a price feed from a stock exchange. The third-party services that provide the connection are called blockchain oracles. If the connection is disrupted, certain steps that are required in a transaction cannot be taken and the contract may fail.
Scaling risk: Current DeFi platforms use a consensus method with slow transaction speeds. Ethereum — “the main technology for decentralised finance”, in Harvey’s words — can process 15 transactions a second. Visa can process 65,000 a second. And the scaling problem is much worse with bitcoin. “In bitcoin, you can only do transactions between people,” he said. “There’s no way in bitcoin to have a smart contract with the current version.”
While some believe DeFi will never match the scale of conventional financial networks, Ethereum is already preparing to migrate to a new and faster consensus method. Meanwhile, horizontal scaling and other novel approaches are being developed to reduce transaction costs.
Custody risk: Self-custody in the form of a digital wallet protects access to crypto assets through a user’s private key. But a misplaced or stolen key can be disastrous. “If you lose your private key, then you lose your cryptocurrency,” Harvey said. “And the private key is a long random number, 256 bits.” To address those concerns, third-party services have stepped in to help users safeguard access.
Regulatory risk: “Regulators are struggling as to what to do with this new space,” Harvey said. “I think they understand the challenge.” But finding the right regulatory balance will be tricky. “If you want to eliminate all risk and be very harsh in the regulations, that means that the technology is going to go offshore,” he explained. “This technology is not a national technology. It is a global technology. So you can run it as easily out of New York as the Cayman Islands.”
In short, regulators face a conundrum. “If you’re too harsh, you kill innovation,” Harvey said. “If you’re too lenient, then you have the Wild West and people are exploited.”
Building a new financial city
Many observers, Harvey among them, believe DeFi creates an opportunity to gain a first-mover advantage in an emerging new order. “These opportunities are rare in history,” he said. “This is not a renovation of our current financial system. It is a rebuild from the bottom up, and we are very early in, maybe one per cent in, where we see the scaffolding of a new city.”
But ironically this new financial system may resemble a much more ancient form of finance: barter. “The barter system was disrupted when money was introduced, and market exchange became much more efficient,” Harvey said. “Decentralised finance redefines money, so we can tokenise any asset.”
And if anyone thinks opting out of DeFi is a viable option, Harvey says think again. “Some of the companies in your portfolio of traditional finance have a bullseye painted on them,” he said. “And if [DeFi] progresses at the same speed that it’s progressed over the last few years, that could lead to a substantial degradation of the value of certain names in your portfolio. So think about it. Even though you’re not in, you’re exposed in a negative way.”
So, may the decentralised force be with us.
If you liked this post, don’t forget to subscribe to the Enterprising Investor.
By Roger Mitchell.
All posts are the opinion of the author. As such, they should not be construed as investment advice, nor do the opinions expressed necessarily reflect the views of CFA Institute or the author’s employer.
Image credit: ©Getty Images/putilich