Jeremy Hunt’s autumn statement has piled further pressure on the “squeezed middle” according to analysis from the Resolution Foundation that found tax rises would deliver a 3.7 per cent income hit to typical households.
The think tank said the uprating of benefits in line with inflation would make a “huge difference to those on low-to-middle incomes”, but the focus on “stealthy” tax threshold freezes to raise revenue would extend far beyond high earners.
“A typical household faces a permanent 3.7 per cent income hit from these measures – the same as the top fifth of households – and bigger than the 3 per cent income hit that the very top twentieth of households will face,” the foundation said.
Tax hikes and spending cuts
Jeremy Hunt set out his plans for £55bn of tax hikes and spending cuts on Thursday against the backdrop of a bleak set of economic forecasts from the Office of Budget Responsibility (OBR), underlining the damage wreaked by the war in Ukraine.
It said that rampaging inflation as a result of the energy price shock meant living standards are set to fall by 7 per cent over the next two years – taking them back to where they were in 2014.
The economy is predicted to contract by 1.4 per cent next year, unemployment is expected to rise by more than 500,000 while taxes are set to reach their highest level as a share of national income since the end of the Second World War.
The Resolution Foundation also found that the budget would reverse much of the Government’s levelling up agenda.
“The £15bn of cuts to capital investment announced yesterday will undo 80 per cent of the remaining increases in public investment announced by previous Chancellor Rishi Sunak, which underpinned the levelling-up agenda,” it said.
Research director James Smith said Britain was getting poorer as an energy importer amid an energy price shock but “deciding how we do so was, to a significant extent, the choice facing the Chancellor”.
“He has decided that households will do so with higher energy bills, higher taxes, and worse public services than previously expected. Whether or not making the choices was tough, the reality of living through the next few years will be,” he said.
Earlier, Hunt was warned by the think tank his planned spending cuts may prove “undeliverable” as he faced criticism from some senior Tories for raising taxes as he seeks to rebuild the UK’s battered public finances.
The Resolution Foundation think tank said such cuts were “likely to be undeliverable” as they would require “years of holding down public sector wages below those in the private sector”.
Former business secretary Jacob Rees-Mogg accused the Chancellor of taking the “easy option” in Thursday’s autumn statement rather than bearing down harder on public spending.
He said the country needed lower taxes to drive up growth after Hunt acknowledged that the UK was already in recession.
At the same time, independent analysts said Hunt’s promised spending cuts would mean a prolonged squeeze on public sector pay despite a growing clamour in many services for real-terms increases after the years of austerity.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) said delaying the difficult decisions as to where the axe will fall until after the next general election would “stretch credulity” and questioned whether they would actually happen.