Licence to operate [Re: Cable is fighting yesterday’s battle, yesterday] Whether Allister Heath likes it or not, the “licence to operate” – a term first popularised by Tomorrow’s Company when protestors were attacking Shell’s petrol stations over the Brent Spar crisis two decades ago – is a reality for free enterprise everywhere. This is not about enterprise needing permission from politicians. Without the frameworks of law, education, health, infrastructure, clean air, and water that society provides, there’d be no foundations on which to build free enterprise. So of course business has to respect its licence to operate from that society. Jamsetji Tata, founder of the Tata group of companies and one of history’s great entrepreneurs, is said to have described business as a “wholly owned subsidiary of society”. He also said that “in a free enterprise, the community is not just another stakeholder in business, but is in fact the very purpose of its existence”. Businesses which forget this rarely create lasting shareholder value. Our own research indicates that a common feature of businesses which have endured over decades is that their sensitivity to society helps them to innovate. One recent study of 50,000 brands across the world found that companies that put people’s lives at the centre of all they did outperformed the stock market average by 400 per cent over ten years. Mark Goyder, founder, Tomorrow’s Company ……………….. BEST OF TWITTER CBI manufacturing optimism strongest since 1973 yet not one MPC member voting to raise rates. @asentance An independent Scotland has parallels with Iceland, warns S&P. @mhewson_CMC Spain: In 2013, 16.3 per cent of all employment was part time versus 11.1 per cent in 2007 @minefornothing Cameron in 2010: “In five years’ time, we will have balanced books.” Deficit is still more than £100bn. @ChrisLeslieMP
Wednesday 23 April 2014 7:35 pmTags: NULL
Letters to the Editor - 24/04 - Licence to operate, Best of Twitter
City A.M.'s opinion pages are a place for thought-provoking views and debate. These views are not necessarily shared by City A.M.