It's easy to criticise the apprenticeship levy - but we need to give it a chance

Euan Blair
Hackathon Held In Miami With Goal Of Improving Communications And Information Access In Cuba
The apprenticeship levy was introduced in April last year (Source: Getty)

The start of 2018 has seen renewed criticism of the apprenticeship levy, with last year’s fall in apprenticeship starts being widely cited as evidence that it has become another business tax.

In fact, the levy represents a milestone in transforming the way employers access talent and how the post-18 education system operates for young people.

Read more: Slump in apprenticeship starts prompts business call for urgent levy rework

Larger organisations have argued that the £27,000 training allowance per apprentice falls short of covering the costs of higher level technical apprenticeship programmes. Others point to a lag in the certification of new training standards, coupled with the sheer size of the financial contribution required of the very largest companies, as barriers to any effective use of the 0.5 per cent levy pot.

As always, there are two sides to this story. For one, the decline in the number of apprenticeship starts follows a marked spike in apprentice hires at the same time the year before, as employers readied themselves for the levy’s introduction in April 2017.

Two additional factors have fuelled initial falls in apprenticeship numbers, alongside a natural teething period as companies assess which apprenticeships will be most effective given their long-term plans.

First, employers are now far more discerning around which providers they work with, and what programmes they introduce, given they are spending their own money, rather than the government’s, on apprenticeships.

Second, smaller, non-levy paying companies, who used to benefit from fully government-funded apprenticeship training and do not pay the levy, are now obligated to cover 10 per cent of the training costs.

Read more: Google secretly acquired a UK startup that could make smartphone speakers obsolete

Neither of these factors on their own are necessarily a bad thing. Employers taking time to plan and actively seek value for money around their apprenticeships will drive better quality programmes. And, by forcing smaller employers to co-invest in the qualification costs, competition for quality and innovation in a historically underwhelming training industry is stimulated. Further, it will help to stop the spread of apprentice roles that essentially amount to cheap labour, thinly veiled as qualifications.

True, the speed with which the legislation was introduced last April left providers playing catch-up to secure certification of new assessment standards in some areas. But there is real scope for innovation in the apprenticeship landscape, and a dose of creativity in the application of ring-fenced funds is resulting in genuinely life-changing opportunities for young people who want a viable alternative to university education.

Google are using the levy to recruit their next cohort of software engineers, with a real emphasis in their hiring process on promoting diversity and inclusion. Selecting entry level talent based on potential, rather than experience, opens the door to candidates who might never otherwise have been considered.

Cyber Security Concerns In The Global Wake of Hacking Threat
Google is using the levy to promote diversity (Source: Getty)

Elsewhere, companies are using the levy to support personal development outside of their usual business functions and existing graduate schemes. Top law firm Mishcon de Reya, for example, has taken on accounting apprentices in their finance department, providing a new pipeline of fresh talent into the firm. This use of the levy to fund an apprenticeship scheme in the operational side of the business evidences the scope of implementation for all levy-paying employers.

The apprenticeship levy was introduced with precisely the objective of empowering employers to play a valuable role in addressing the growing UK skills gap. It is easy to criticise the realisation of a new policy, and there are certainly issues still to be resolved.

But the levy provides employers with a golden opportunity to diversify their entry-level talent and mould the kind of leaders they want driving their business in the future. It’s time that this positive potential was given equal recognition alongside the inevitable challenges faced in the levy’s application.

City A.M.'s opinion pages are a place for thought-provoking views and debate. These views are not necessarily shared by City A.M.

Related articles