“Obviously a restructuring is preferable to bankruptcy. But receivership is still a step closer to bankruptcy. We’ve always warned investors it was extremely risky,” said Jan Maarten Slagter, director of the Dutch shareholders’ association, VEB.
Saab, rescued from closure by General Motors in early 2010 by Amsterdam-listed Spyker Cars -- which was later renamed Swedish Automobile (Swan) -- has struggled for several months while it pursues funding from an assortment of Chinese and other investors.
Production at its Swedish plant has been at an almost unbroken standstill since April because suppliers refused to provide parts until they received payment.
In June, Saab said two Chinese car companies, Pangda Automobile Trade and Zhejiang Youngman Lotus Automobil, had agreed to take a combined majority stake in the firm for a total of €245m (£216m).
The deals are still awaiting approval from the Chinese authorities, but the regulators have halted planned investments in the past, such as Saab’s failed deal with Hawtai Motor Group in May and Sichuan Tengzhong’s bid for GM’s Hummer.