Beware Blair: The West must not learn the wrong lessons from Iraq
17 June 2014 9:59pm
MUCH as I am intellectually fond of Boris Johnson, he is entirely wrong about both former Prime Minister Tony Blair and his motivation for speaking out on the present Iraq crisis. For those of us who were against the initial Iraq war (I lost my job in America for my pains), it was certainly emotionally gratifying to watch the mayor of London have at it. Saying Blair had become “unhinged” by Iraq, Johnson has come to the conclusion that “Blair has finally gone mad.”
But it is so much worse than that. For there is supreme method to the former Prime Minister’s madness, as he seeks to rehabilitate himself and his neoconservative allies, whose disastrous folly in Iraq cost over $1 trillion, led to the deaths of thousands of western troops (and over 100,000 Iraqis), and left Iran as the dominant power in the Gulf, as Iraq predictably became a shambles. In essence, both in the essay he released at the weekend and elsewhere, Blair has been arguing that the West was right to intervene in Iraq in 2003, and that we would be right to intervene there now – as ISIS rampages across the country. Name-calling in the face of such wrong-headedness is enjoyable; better still, let’s take the former Prime Minister seriously, and demolish his fanciful case.
The first misleading historical lesson to unlearn from the neoconservative argument is their tenuous grasp of what primary national interests amount to. Every evil in the world certainly does not amount to a sea monster that the West must spend blood and treasure destroying; instead, choices about intervention must be made, based upon a reading of western national interests.
But intellectual alarmism is absolutely necessary to sustain the Blairite/neocon worldview. Blair argues that the West would still have a major problem in Iraq even without the 2003 invasion. True enough, but would this problem be so acute that we would now be compelled to use boots on the ground to set it right? Are the options merely force now, or force later?
Blair goes on to say that the current crisis in Iraq affects us all, while urging a greater western role there. But does it directly affect us in London, in Washington, in Montana? How? And if it does, is the impact sufficient for us to risk the lives of our soldiers to fight someone else’s war?
To put it mildly, our recent track record is not fantastic, in Somalia, Iraq, or Afghanistan. Indeed, as Johnson rightly had it, surely at some level the bungled post-invasion planning in 2003 is at least partly responsible for the mess Iraq now finds itself in, even beyond Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Maliki’s sectarianism and Syria. Obviously, overthrowing Saddam – after 24 years of ironclad dictatorship – left Iraq in pieces. But it is easy to see why Blair is yearning to “liberate” us all from the notion that the West’s gormless intervention is part of the problem. For to learn the real historical lesson here – that we cannot want a stable Iraq more than the Iraqis do – will call into question the entire neoconservative project, and Blair’s life’s work.
Instead of speaking in faux, universal truths, the far less dazzling (but far more sensible) foreign secretary William Hague has laid out specific, useful guidelines as to when intervention should be attempted in the future. Military intervention should only be used as a last resort (and not a first one, as the neocons seem to prefer), our political goals for doing so should be clear and limited, and a comprehensive post-invasion plan must be jointly agreed with regional and local powers before (not after) any such invasion is launched. If one adds in the fact that such an operation should only be engaged in when primary western interests are at stake, real and useful historical lessons will have been learned from all that has happened.
But that, of course, is the last thing Blair wants. Beware of men who use history to attempt to absolve themselves of its consequences. Blair grandly concludes, regarding the present Iraq crisis, that “we have to put aside the differences of the past and act now to save the future.” He could not be more wrong, or more dangerous. Instead, only by facing up to the true historical errors of the recent past can we act wisely in saving the future.
And as for Blair, I will leave him to this quote from Oliver Cromwell, spoken when dissolving the Long Parliament in April 1653: “You have sat too long for any good you have been doing lately... Depart, I say; and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go!”
Dr John C Hulsman is senior columnist at City A.M., and president and co-founder of John C Hulsman Enterprises (www.john-hulsman.com), a global political risk consultancy. He is a life member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and author of Ethical Realism, The Godfather Doctrine, and most recently Lawrence of Arabia, To Begin the World Over Again.
In other news
A British Airways flight from London to New York is returning to Heathrow after issuing an emergency alert. [Read more]
Banks are finally starting to lend to Britain's small and medium sized businesses new data has shown, suggesting [Read more]
Just eight years ago, there was no iPhone, while a mere decade ago, half of all Britain's internet connections [Read more]
The nationwide rail strike, called off at the 11th hour last week, has been rescheduled for next week. [Read more]
Women's teams will feature on the forthcoming Fifa '16 video games - marking the first time women's football has [Read more]
Just a day after the Queen's Speech confirmed what we knew the Tories would have to do, a bill has dropped into [Read more]
Avago Technologies has sealed a $37bn acquisition of fellow semiconductor company Broadcom to create an industry [Read more]
Russian President Vladimir Putin has accused the United States of meddling in affairs beyond its jurisdiction [Read more]
The UK's GDP increased by 0.3 per cent in the first quarter of 2015, according to the latest figures from the [Read more]
Five people were arrested after the anti-austerity protest in Whitehall and Trafalgar Square turned voilent yesterday. [Read more]
Claire Perry has said “at times, the delays and disruption that are occurring are simply inexcusable.” [Read more]
Like electing a boss of Fifa whose surname isn’t Blatter or extracting an apology from Thomas Cook, reforming [Read more]
Britain's FinTech sector is a particularly bright spot in the UK’s recovering economy. Investment in London [Read more]
Currency volatility did Kingfisher no favours in the first quarter of 2015, but investors have not been put off. [Read more]
Power systems manufacturer Rolls-Royce has signed an €80m (£57m) contract with General Dynamics European Land [Read more]
Tool hire giant HSS saw its shares rise yesterday after reporting first-quarter trading in line with expectations.
Irn-Bru maker AG Barr announced yesterday that it plans to expand its state-of-the-art canning plant at Milton [Read more]