HS2 backers have completely failed to make a convincing case
28 April 2014 11:27pm
YESTERDAY saw the House of Commons give the green light to HS2 at second reading, with the bill now heading into Committee stage. And as the debate has twisted and turned over the years, so the justification for this huge taxpayer-funded rail project has mutated. At first, the reduction in journey times was considered the slam dunk. When that was scrutinised, focus shifted to capacity constraints in HS2’s absence. Now the main reasoning has changed once again. The new line is heralded as essential for the revival of the North’s economy, and for helping close the North-South divide.
When there is political concern about the powerful pull of London and a desire to rebalance the economy, claims that grandiose schemes like HS2 will transform the regions obviously resonate with certain constituencies. But the evidence base is distinctly lacking. In a report published yesterday, my colleague Richard Wellings clearly documented that the experience of HS1 in East Kent, and of the fast line between Doncaster and London, suggests that faster rail links are not a sufficient condition for economic prosperity.
In East Kent, for example, the average employment rate was 5 percentage points lower between 2010 and 2013 than during the pre-high-speed period examined, compared with much smaller falls of 2.1 percentage points for the South East and 1.8 percentage points nationally. Doncaster, meanwhile, remains one of the poorest towns in the country.
Pointing this out is not to deny that improved connectivity can have substantial positive economic effects. Reductions in transport costs help lower the cost of exchange – in turn boosting trade, bringing higher productivity through specialisation, and realising economies of scale. It can also enable the development of agglomerations, clusters of activity that may further increase productivity and output.
But this reasoning is not sufficient to justify huge public spending on this particular project. And this is not just because HS2’s purported effects on productivity have been criticised as a massive exaggeration (due to the difficulty of disentangling better rail connectivity from other factors). No, the key problem is that, when you are spending this amount of money, you don’t only have a duty to claim there are some benefits. You must also take into account what economists call the “opportunity cost” – the other ways these vast resources (£3,000 per household) could be put to use on other projects or tax cuts.
It’s clear from a transport perspective that there are better alternative projects, achievable at a fraction of the cost – cross-Pennine projects linking the major cities of Manchester, Sheffield and Leeds could help create the benefits of a single labour market, while the existing West Coast Main Line could be upgraded.
Road improvements would likely have more significant payoffs still and, given the potential future importance of innovations such as the driverless car, the benefits would be less likely to be undone by disruptive technologies. Indeed, forecasting benefits from HS2 far into the future necessarily ignores the potential for innovation to completely change the way we travel or choose to interact.
The proponents of HS2 have failed to make a case which addresses all these criticisms. The case for HS2 has instead been contorted and changed to fit a political narrative. Given the large cost to taxpayers, we deserve better.
Ryan Bourne is head of public policy at the Institute of Economic Affairs.
In other news
The Chinese city of Guangzhou may have banned Uber, but that hasn’t stopped its municipal government setting [Read more]
Labour has performed a balletic U-turn this morning, abandoning its opposition to EU membership referendum. [Read more]
Greece’s interior minister has said that the country cannot afford its 5 June payment to the International Monetary [Read more]
Young people aged 16 and 17 years old should be given the chance to vote in a EU referendum, according to the [Read more]
The Bank of England is carrying out a confidential investigation into what would happen if the UK left the European [Read more]
This year's Eurovision Song Contest will feature an addition to the normal line up – for the first time ever, [Read more]
Tonight is the 60th Eurovision Song Contest, and once again we're in for an evening of cheesy music and crazy [Read more]
The Eurovision Song Contest is getting more and more expensive, despite Europe's decline into austerity. [Read more]
There were delays of up to 30 minutes to trains in and out of Kings Cross Station, after the station was re-opened [Read more]
When a 20-year-old footballer publicly declares he wants to leave a club and his agent hurls insults at one of [Read more]
The outbreak of bird flu in the US is leading to an unprecedented situation for companies reliant on eggs – [Read more]
Germany's finance ministry has denied reports it was considering offering Greece its own parallel currency. [Read more]
Chancellor George Osborne was given a boost today, as higher tax receipts helped shrink the deficit by more than [Read more]
Beleaguered spread-betting firm Plus500 today suspended trading in its shares on London's junior market, following [Read more]
The news that card and electronic transactions have overtaken cash as the UK’s preferred method of payment is [Read more]
Despite the crippling effect of election uncertainty, offers received in April were up 15 per cent on last year [Read more]
Former secretary of state for communities and local government Eric Pickles is to be knighted, 10 Downing Street [Read more]
Network Rail engineers have destroyed the Abbey Wood station as part of the Crossrail development that is expected [Read more]