Theresa May rubbishes Jeremy Corbyn's attack over Syria airstrikes, as Labour MPs back government on action

Catherine Neilan
Follow Catherine
Source: Getty

Prominent Labour MPs have backed the government over the airstrikes in Syria, rather than side with their own leadership, with Theresa May claiming Jeremy Corbyn's approach would mean "a Russian veto on our foreign policy".

The Commons listened in silence as the Prime Minister explained her reasoning for the "limited, targeted and effective" airstrikes on Friday night. She detailed the three locations, which included chemicals weapons storage facilities, a research centre and a chemicals weapon bunker and command post.

She claimed that the Assad regime and Russia were trying to conceal the attack and she felt the need to act "rapidly" to try and stop further attacks. Diplomatic efforts had been "repeatedly thwarted", she added, and pointed to Russia's veto of an investigation in the UN Security Council last week.

May noted that Corbyn has said he would only take action in Syria if UN endorsed it but that would mean "a Russian veto on our foreign policy".

Her position was backed by former attorney general Dominic Grieve, who said: “Any tyrant or megalomaniac, if they have support of an amoral state on the UN Security Council, could act with impunity, far from upholding the international rules based system, it would be dead.”

But Corbyn countered this by claiming she was following orders from US President Trump, and argued that the decision on humanitarian grounds was "legally questionable", asking whether she was planning to intervene in the ongoing crisis in Yemen by blocking arms sales to Saudi Arabia.

He also used the opportunity to reiterate his call for a new War Powers Act to be brought to parliament, while claiming there was footage of "both journalists and local people in the rubble without any protective clothing."

However, Corbyn seemed out of kilter with the majority of his fellow MPs once again.

Labour's Chris Leslie said: "Those who would turn a blind eye, who would do nothing in pursuit of some moral high ground, should also be held accountable, for once, today as well."

Colleague Mike Gapes reminded his leader that there was “longstanding tradition on these benches in support of humanitarian intervention” and acting outside the UN.

John Woodcock echoed this, saying it would be “shameful” if UK support for the principle of humanitarian intervention were abandoned by people who would not support military intervention in any circumstances.

Related articles