views
What is City Talk? Info Info. Latest

Is South Korea still an investment ‘value trap’?

 
Juan Torres Rodriguez
Follow Juan
South Koreans Hold Rallies Against Japan  Regarding Territorial Dispute
South Korea has remained an 'emerging market' despite the country's fast-growing wealth (Source: Getty)

‘Value trap’ is a term used by investors to describe an asset that appears to have been under-priced by the market but turns out to be cheap for a reason.

This is often because its ability to make profits has in some way been severely and permanently impaired.

It tends to be used in relation to companies but plenty of investors have viewed the South Korean market this way over the last couple of decades.

In this time, South Korea has proved awkward to categorise – as investors like to do – as a developed or emerging market.

On the one hand, the country’s gross domestic product per person is near – and in some cases ahead of – developed economies. And, in Samsung, it boasts one of the world’s largest companies.

On the other hand, the posturing of South Korea’s volatile neighbour to the north tends to make markets nervous.

Arguably what has served most to keep South Korea as an emerging market, however, is not geography but the preponderance of ‘chaebols’ – the name in South Korea for large conglomerates that tend to be run by one person or a handful of people from the same family.

These businesses tend to have lazy balance sheets – that is, large net cash positions, zero debt, low dividend yields – and corporate governance practices that leave a lot to be desired.

Global and emerging market investors have never been in doubt that, were the chaebols to clean up their act, then a great deal of value could be unlocked from one of the cheapest markets in the world.

In the past, many have identified signs this was happening only, ultimately, to be disappointed – hence the ‘value trap’ tag.

Could now be a good time to invest for value?

So why are we writing about South Korea now on The Value Perspective? Well, a new wave of optimism about the country’s economic prospects has sprung up as a result of – perhaps surprisingly – its new left-wing government. Having come to power last month in an early election that followed the impeachment of former president Park Guen-hye, the new administration is expected to introduce some positive market reforms.

So could it really be possible that – to use the four most dangerous words in investment – ‘this time it’s different’? Writing in his GREED & fear blog, CLSA analyst Christopher Wood shares our circumspection, observing: “Having looked at the Korean market for more years than GREED & fear would care to remember, it is naturally difficult to make the leap of faith that corporate governance reform is finally at hand.

“But if it is really the case, this is a big deal since the Korean market is still cheap, both in absolute terms and relative to its own history.”

South Korea has previously been a popular hunting ground for investors. It was remarked upon in a preface of a 2009 edition of the value investor’s bible, “Security Analysis” by Graham & Dodd.

It noted the disillusionment with South Korean companies in the early 2000s: “Bargain issuers, such as Posco and SK Telecom, ultimately attracted many value seekers; [Warren] Buffett reportedly profited handsomely from a number of South Korean holdings.”

South Korea was also popular with value investors during the depths of the Asian debt crisis in 1998.

But South Korea can also have a habit of failing to live up to investors’ expectations so, here on The Value Perspective, we will not be getting too excited just yet. Still, having watched the market very closely over the last six months, we will continue to do so with even greater interest.

  • Juan Torres Rodriguez is an author on The Value Perspective, a blog about value investing. It is a long-term investing approach which focuses on exploiting swings in stock market sentiment, targeting companies which are valued at less than their true worth and waiting for a correction.

Click and enter your email to get a weekly round-up of investment ideas

Important Information: The views and opinions contained herein are those of Juan Torres Rodriguez, Research Analyst, Equity Value, and may not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders communications, strategies or funds. The sectors and securities shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be considered a recommendation to buy or sell. This material is intended to be for information purposes only and is not intended as promotional material in any respect. The material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. The material is not intended to provide and should not be relied on for accounting, legal or tax advice, or investment recommendations. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information in this document when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested. All investments involve risks including the risk of possible loss of principal. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Schroders does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information in this document when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. The opinions in this document include some forecasted views. We believe we are basing our expectations and beliefs on reasonable assumptions within the bounds of what we currently know. However, there is no guarantee than any forecasts or opinions will be realised. These views and opinions may change. Issued by Schroder Investment Management Limited, 31 Gresham Street, London EC2V 7QA. Registration No. 1893220 England. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.

City A.M.'s opinion pages are a place for thought-provoking views and debate. These views are not necessarily shared by City A.M.

Related articles