Retailers slammed for "dodgy" discounting practices in super-complaint to CMA

 
Catherine Neilan
Follow Catherine
Which believes consumers could be losing out on hundreds of millions of pounds (Source: Getty)

Retailers could face an investigation into their discounts and promotional activity after consumer campaigning group Which filed a “super-complaint” to the Competition and Markets Authority.

Which claims retailers are “confusing consumers with tactics that exaggerate discounts and manipulate shoppers”, arguing they create “the illusion of savings that don't exist”.
In 2013, the UK spent around £115bn on groceries, of which it is estimated 40 per cent was sold on promotion. Which claims consumers are collectively losing out on hundreds of millions of pounds because of these tactics.
Which has identified three key areas of concern – multi-buys, the idea that a larger pack is better value and seasonal offers.

What Which says about multi-buys

Asda increased the price of a Chicago Town Four Cheese Pizza Two-Pack from £1.50 to £2 as it went onto multi-buy at two for £3. It went back to £1.50 as the ‘offer’ ended (2014).

 

"Prices increase when going on multi-buy so that the saving is less than claimed, non-existent or the products are more expensive when they are included in the multi-buy."

 

What Which says about “larger pack, better value”

Tesco sold four cans of Green Giant Original Sweetcorn for £2 (was £2.44), but six cans were proportionately more expensive, at £3.56. That’s despite the fact the larger pack said ‘special value’ (2014).

 

 

Which has found "instances where the individual item price of the bigger pack is actually more expensive".

 

 

What Which says about seasonal offers

We found a Nestle Kit Kat Chunky Collection Giant Egg was advertised at £7.49 for just 10 days in January at Ocado, but then sold on offer at £5 for 51 days (2015).

 

 

Which has found instances where "the higher price only applied out of season".

 

 

“These tactics manipulate consumer spending by misleading people into choosing products they may not have picked if they knew the full facts,” the group said.
Executive director, Richard Lloyd added: “'Despite Which repeatedly exposing misleading and confusing pricing tactics, and calling for voluntary change by the retailers, these dodgy offers remain on numerous supermarket shelves. Shoppers think they’re getting a bargain but in reality it’s impossible for any consumer to know if they’re genuinely getting a fair deal.
“We’re saying enough is enough and using one of the most powerful legal weapons in our armoury to act on behalf of consumers by launching a super-complaint to the regulator. We want an end to misleading pricing tactics and for all retailers to use fair pricing that people can trust.”
The CMA has 90 days to decide whether to proceed with an investigation. But not everyone believes this could yield any results for consumers.
Clive Black of Shore Cap said: "There will probably be a prolonged inquiry, which can be expected to draw upon a vast array of senior management time, no doubt embellished with lashings of legal counsel.
"In the meantime shoppers of the UK, which should be effectively protected by the authorities ‎from law-makers to local trading standards officers it should be said, so what are they doing, move on, living in a real word and not a parody of a Whitehall farce where non-fiction becomes reality."

Related articles